Exclaimer vs. CodeTwo — the two big server-side platforms.
If you've narrowed it to Exclaimer vs CodeTwo you're already committed to server-side signature injection, and you're almost certainly on Microsoft 365. Good news: both products are mature and neither is a bad pick. The differences are real but subtle — this is the honest breakdown.
Pricing reflects published tiers as of early 2026.
- • Marketing is driving the buy — banner campaigns matter.
- • You need Google Workspace support too.
- • You want the polished designer and richer preview.
- • A/B testing signatures is a real requirement.
- • Microsoft 365 only and IT is driving.
- • Per-mailbox cost matters at your headcount.
- • Deep directory-attribute rules are non-negotiable.
- • You want a technical admin console over a marketing one.
Server-side injection is the right architecture at 500+. Under 200 the mail-flow connector project is usually more overhead than the problem it solves. Wren is client-installed, centrally designed, has the swappable banner as its core feature, and is flat $99/mo up to 50 people or $199/mo up to 100 — no per-mailbox billing, no connector, no DNS changes. Design one free →
Related: Exclaimer vs WiseStamp · CodeTwo vs WiseStamp · Wren vs Exclaimer · Wren vs CodeTwo